Red Teams are a romanticised part of security testing; and whilst red team engagements are usually amongst the most fun to deliver – but being fun to deliver doesn’t mean they’re always the most effective from a security point of view. A lot depends on the target organisation’s maturity, defensive capability, and engagement goals.
I occasionally see the terms Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Test used interchangeably, or worse, phrases such as “Automated Penetration Test” – something that really pains me, as there are very distinct types of assessment. In this article I’d like to show the distinctions between the different types of assessment. Setting aside any argument of specific terminology, I aim to explain the different approaches that can be taken and the aims of each – regardless of what you choose to call them. I aim to assist companies engage with their security assessment providers to ensure that the service they’re getting is what they are …
This is one part of a two part series, maybe take a look at Hacking a Corporation From the Inside: Internal Penetration Tests too! Introduction Occasionally I get asked by clients how I approach the technical aspects of a Penetration Test, you know, what are all those little black boxes with green text that I’ve got open on my screen? Also occasionally, when I’m talking to new testers and people interested in becoming a penetration tester, they understand tool use and they often understand the specifics of vulnerabilities but don’t necessarily know how it all goes together.
The aim of this post is not to talk about how to perform effective penetration tests, but it’s more around taking the first steps towards a career as a Penetration Tester. I want to talk about the kind of things that I look for in candidates, the kind of skills that I found useful when starting out, and as a candidate what to look at first. Information Security is a huge field and you’ve got a whole career to learn all of the details, but where should you start?